<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Email Links are Bad for Feedback?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, New Media and Web 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-643833</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/12/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-643833</guid>
		<description>I hate feedback forms on the websites of companies with whom I do business.  Several of them have broken email address validation scripts.  They say that my preferred email address is not valid -- and refuse to accept my message unless I give them an address that I don't check nearly as often.

It's like the "use this browser or we won't talk to you" mentality with which some websites are designed.

Bottom line: Make it difficult for your customer to talk to you, and they'll be motivated to become someone else's customer instead.

"Darwin Award" wannabes refuse all input channels other than a browser-based feedback form.  Let the customer decide whether they want to use a browser-based form.  Give them an email address to use or be prepared to lose them as a customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate feedback forms on the websites of companies with whom I do business.  Several of them have broken email address validation scripts.  They say that my preferred email address is not valid &#8212; and refuse to accept my message unless I give them an address that I don&#8217;t check nearly as often.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the &#8220;use this browser or we won&#8217;t talk to you&#8221; mentality with which some websites are designed.</p>
<p>Bottom line: Make it difficult for your customer to talk to you, and they&#8217;ll be motivated to become someone else&#8217;s customer instead.</p>
<p>&#8220;Darwin Award&#8221; wannabes refuse all input channels other than a browser-based feedback form.  Let the customer decide whether they want to use a browser-based form.  Give them an email address to use or be prepared to lose them as a customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-377652</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/12/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-377652</guid>
		<description>Nope guys, I totally agree with this article.  Spammers BITE!!!

I much rather USE a form when I visit sites for the reason above.  I really did used to go through all that crappy hassle with e-mail programs opening up I had no idea how to use, etc.  FRUSTRATING!!

However, when there is a form, it's so much easier and I know it's gonna make it to the soon-to-be recipient.  

Not to mention lots of the auto-responder programs out there send the 'sender' a copy of the e-mail message just sent VIA form.  

Not bad.  ;-)

Agree that placing your e-mail on a graphic first is cool, however it's not possible to cut and paste.  If it's a long e-mail addy, that's a pain, too.

I do like using the blahblah[at]suchandsuch[dot]com

Still a little of a pin for copy/paste, but at least you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope guys, I totally agree with this article.  Spammers BITE!!!</p>
<p>I much rather USE a form when I visit sites for the reason above.  I really did used to go through all that crappy hassle with e-mail programs opening up I had no idea how to use, etc.  FRUSTRATING!!</p>
<p>However, when there is a form, it&#8217;s so much easier and I know it&#8217;s gonna make it to the soon-to-be recipient.  </p>
<p>Not to mention lots of the auto-responder programs out there send the &#8217;sender&#8217; a copy of the e-mail message just sent VIA form.  </p>
<p>Not bad.  <img src='http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Agree that placing your e-mail on a graphic first is cool, however it&#8217;s not possible to cut and paste.  If it&#8217;s a long e-mail addy, that&#8217;s a pain, too.</p>
<p>I do like using the blahblah[at]suchandsuch[dot]com</p>
<p>Still a little of a pin for copy/paste, but at least you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/12/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>People with decent setup either have their e-mail client integrated into the browser (as I have with Opera's M2), or have their e-mail client running hidden in the tray.

Of course, your comment may be valid for some people, but for me personally an e-mail link is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People with decent setup either have their e-mail client integrated into the browser (as I have with Opera&#8217;s M2), or have their e-mail client running hidden in the tray.</p>
<p>Of course, your comment may be valid for some people, but for me personally an e-mail link is much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/12/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>What Yaron said.  plus, your scenario is very far fetched... I mean if people can't send email they're farked anyways.

I *hate* feedback forms.  It's a nice way for folks to get an untrackable question that I may forget about later.  With email I can resend them the question 2 days later with an "are you alive?" comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Yaron said.  plus, your scenario is very far fetched&#8230; I mean if people can&#8217;t send email they&#8217;re farked anyways.</p>
<p>I *hate* feedback forms.  It&#8217;s a nice way for folks to get an untrackable question that I may forget about later.  With email I can resend them the question 2 days later with an &#8220;are you alive?&#8221; comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaron</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/02/12/why-email-links-are-bad-for-feedback/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I still think an email is better.

1. I know what I send and where I send it to, and I know I have a copy.
2. If I suspect I'll need further contact, keeping the email address is usually easier than maintaining a bookmark for a contact form.

The writing on the palm was obviously an exaggaration, but copy&#38;paste works well enough for this to hardly ever be a problem.

And if you're using firefox, there is this &lt;a HREF="http://jedbrown.net/1.0/mozilla/extensions/#WebMailCompose" rel="nofollow"&gt;extension&lt;/A&gt; (not related to me in any way, I'm just using it) which connects those mailto links directly to webmail interfaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think an email is better.</p>
<p>1. I know what I send and where I send it to, and I know I have a copy.<br />
2. If I suspect I&#8217;ll need further contact, keeping the email address is usually easier than maintaining a bookmark for a contact form.</p>
<p>The writing on the palm was obviously an exaggaration, but copy&amp;paste works well enough for this to hardly ever be a problem.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re using firefox, there is this <a HREF="http://jedbrown.net/1.0/mozilla/extensions/#WebMailCompose" rel="nofollow">extension</a> (not related to me in any way, I&#8217;m just using it) which connects those mailto links directly to webmail interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
