<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Programming Fonts for Easy Coding and Readability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Blogging Tips, Guestblogging, Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:37:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-2/#comment-750338</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-750338</guid>
		<description>went through nearly all of these fonts, including some of the more exotic ones..

in the end, liberation mono, as rendered through OS X&#039;s font engine, came out above the rest.

it&#039;s worth a serious look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>went through nearly all of these fonts, including some of the more exotic ones..</p>
<p>in the end, liberation mono, as rendered through OS X&#8217;s font engine, came out above the rest.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s worth a serious look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wind</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-2/#comment-748229</link>
		<dc:creator>wind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-748229</guid>
		<description>WOW!
Anonymous is so good!
Thank you share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!<br />
Anonymous is so good!<br />
Thank you share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shashank</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-660364</link>
		<dc:creator>Shashank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-660364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried Proggy etc. Then, for a while, Monaco which is available on Macs, which looks great with antialiasing in ClearType on Windows. 

But I have now finally settled for &quot;Deja Vu Sans&quot; and it&#039;s mono type fonts. This is the default code font in Ubuntu, and it&#039;s so fantastic that it&#039;s my default font in Windows too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried Proggy etc. Then, for a while, Monaco which is available on Macs, which looks great with antialiasing in ClearType on Windows. </p>
<p>But I have now finally settled for &#8220;Deja Vu Sans&#8221; and it&#8217;s mono type fonts. This is the default code font in Ubuntu, and it&#8217;s so fantastic that it&#8217;s my default font in Windows too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-639029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-639029</guid>
		<description>scrod, another indication that someone doesn&#039;t work in software development is when they say &quot;all the codes they tweak&quot; instead of &quot;all the codes we tweak.&quot; :P

On the font front, I&#039;m using Consolas now but I&#039;m Pragmata-curious. Seriously thinking of rolling my own damn font one day. I want clear, readable, and small in both dimensions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scrod, another indication that someone doesn&#8217;t work in software development is when they say &#8220;all the codes they tweak&#8221; instead of &#8220;all the codes we tweak.&#8221; :P</p>
<p>On the font front, I&#8217;m using Consolas now but I&#8217;m Pragmata-curious. Seriously thinking of rolling my own damn font one day. I want clear, readable, and small in both dimensions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Guard</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-439696</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Guard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-439696</guid>
		<description>Check out my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.damieng.com/blog/archive/2007/08/19/envy-code-r-preview-6-released-with-visual-studio-italics.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Envy Code R&lt;/a&gt; font - it&#039;s designed for 10 point but is properly scalable and takes advantage of ClearType.  Includes italic, bold and a hack to let the italic work within Visual Studio.

[)amien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out my <a href="http://www.damieng.com/blog/archive/2007/08/19/envy-code-r-preview-6-released-with-visual-studio-italics.aspx" rel="nofollow">Envy Code R</a> font &#8211; it&#8217;s designed for 10 point but is properly scalable and takes advantage of ClearType.  Includes italic, bold and a hack to let the italic work within Visual Studio.</p>
<p>[)amien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QuickOnlineTips</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-429540</link>
		<dc:creator>QuickOnlineTips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-429540</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scrod. Well now you know I am not working in software development. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scrod. Well now you know I am not working in software development. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scrod</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/comment-page-1/#comment-429462</link>
		<dc:creator>scrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/#comment-429462</guid>
		<description>There is a simple test to determine who works in software development and who doesn&#039;t.  It&#039;s in the use of the word &quot;code&quot; or &quot;coding&quot; to refer to writing software.  Those who aren&#039;t close to the industry have trouble with the usage of that word.  One gives himself away usually with a usage like &quot;all the codes they tweak.&quot;

Code is never pluralized.  It&#039;s a dead giveaway to anywone who isn&#039;t a programmer.  You should say all the code they have to stare at.  (&quot;Tweaking code&quot; is a bit weak too.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a simple test to determine who works in software development and who doesn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s in the use of the word &#8220;code&#8221; or &#8220;coding&#8221; to refer to writing software.  Those who aren&#8217;t close to the industry have trouble with the usage of that word.  One gives himself away usually with a usage like &#8220;all the codes they tweak.&#8221;</p>
<p>Code is never pluralized.  It&#8217;s a dead giveaway to anywone who isn&#8217;t a programmer.  You should say all the code they have to stare at.  (&#8220;Tweaking code&#8221; is a bit weak too.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2006/11/best-programming-fonts-for-easier-coding-and-readability/feed/ ) in 0.50674 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:07 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 8:07 am UTC -->
