Comments on: Update Google Analytics Code to ga.js for Better Tracking http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/ Technology News, Blogging Tips, Guestblogging, Social Media Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:37:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: todd http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-2/#comment-713596 todd Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:02:52 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-713596 I am currently using Google Analytics and I have all pages tagged properly including the receipts page (with the GA ecommerce tracking code)however I cannot seem to get my revenue indicators to report. What might I be doing wrong? I am currently using Google Analytics and I have all pages tagged properly including the receipts page (with the GA ecommerce tracking code)however I cannot seem to get my revenue indicators to report. What might I be doing wrong?

]]> By: Dean http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-2/#comment-693892 Dean Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:34:38 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-693892 When switching from legacy to the newer ga.js, do you get a lull in statistics? When switching from legacy to the newer ga.js, do you get a lull in statistics?

]]> By: jon nixon http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-608982 jon nixon Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:05:20 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-608982 Check out line 435 of the source of this page the "/" and "\" are replaced by their numerical ascii characters Check out line 435 of the source of this page the “/” and “\” are replaced by their numerical ascii characters

]]> By: les http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-606676 les Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:40:35 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-606676 You appear to be using Wordpress - I cannot get this new code to validate on my wordpress blog - I am also having trouble with mybloglog and blogcatalog - it is a shame as I would like to use the new code. Did you have any difficulties with validation? the radical blogger You appear to be using WordPress – I cannot get this new code to validate on my wordpress blog – I am also having trouble with mybloglog and blogcatalog – it is a shame as I would like to use the new code. Did you have any difficulties with validation?

the radical blogger

]]> By: Dave Pen http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-606390 Dave Pen Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:12:58 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-606390 This is an eye opener to most bloggers. Thanks This is an eye opener to most bloggers. Thanks

]]> By: Alp http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-606314 Alp Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:26:48 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-606314 thank you, very handy thank you, very handy

]]> By: Haris http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/comment-page-1/#comment-605517 Haris Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:37:09 +0000 http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2007/12/update-google-analytics-code-to-gajs-for-better-tracking/#comment-605517 ga.js tracking code looks a lot better. I never knew that. Thanks for sharing it! :) ga.js tracking code looks a lot better. I never knew that. Thanks for sharing it! :)

]]>