<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Fails to Buy Yahoo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, New Media and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carpadium Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is transparent synchronisation the next killer app for mobiles?</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-714120</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpadium Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is transparent synchronisation the next killer app for mobiles?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3130#comment-714120</guid>
		<description>[...] Google is at the other end of the scale. Their entire service offering is in the cloud, and they give everything away for free, making (lots of) money on targeted advertising. Microsoft is certainly trying to respond to Google, but if you need any proof that they don&#8217;t have a plan or a clue about how to compete online, then just check out their recent attempt to buy Yahoo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google is at the other end of the scale. Their entire service offering is in the cloud, and they give everything away for free, making (lots of) money on targeted advertising. Microsoft is certainly trying to respond to Google, but if you need any proof that they don&#8217;t have a plan or a clue about how to compete online, then just check out their recent attempt to buy Yahoo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Declining Value Of Redundant News Content On The Web - Publishing 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-634029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Declining Value Of Redundant News Content On The Web - Publishing 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3130#comment-634029</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Evans, Los Angeles Times, WebGuild, Mashable!, Todd Bishop&#8217;s Microsoft Blog, Valleywag, Quick Online Tips, GigaOM, Profy.Com, AppScout, ClickZ News Blog, The Register and Scobleizer     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Evans, Los Angeles Times, WebGuild, Mashable!, Todd Bishop&#8217;s Microsoft Blog, Valleywag, Quick Online Tips, GigaOM, Profy.Com, AppScout, ClickZ News Blog, The Register and Scobleizer     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YHOO Shares Crash: MSFT, GOOG Stocks Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-634002</link>
		<dc:creator>YHOO Shares Crash: MSFT, GOOG Stocks Rise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3130#comment-634002</guid>
		<description>[...]        &#171; Previous Post     May 5th, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]        &laquo; Previous Post     May 5th, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/05/microsoft-unable-to-buy-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-633956</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3130#comment-633956</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy that this whole drama had ended up! I am a Yahoo! fan and I never wanted that Yahoo! goes to Microsoft. These two big giants worlds on their own policies and they are best on their own places. Combining them two together is not a good choice, isn’t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
