<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Exposing Mojave Experiment be its End?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Blogging Tips, Guestblogging, Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: boiler repairs</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-809317</link>
		<dc:creator>boiler repairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3556#comment-809317</guid>
		<description>I have seen other articles and remarks which are broadly in accord with Could Exposing Mojave Experiment be its End? but I have to recognize that this post has some supplementary information.  Why didnt I think about this? I would truly like to understand more on this theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen other articles and remarks which are broadly in accord with Could Exposing Mojave Experiment be its End? but I have to recognize that this post has some supplementary information.  Why didnt I think about this? I would truly like to understand more on this theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remote desktop software</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-737906</link>
		<dc:creator>remote desktop software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3556#comment-737906</guid>
		<description>The seemingly underappreciated Windows Vista may become more popular after Windows Operating Systems exposes their Mojave Experiment.  And if I recall correctly, Pepsi sales increased as well after its &quot;Pepsi Challenge&quot; experiment. Sometimes its more about the marketing of a product than the technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The seemingly underappreciated Windows Vista may become more popular after Windows Operating Systems exposes their Mojave Experiment.  And if I recall correctly, Pepsi sales increased as well after its &#8220;Pepsi Challenge&#8221; experiment. Sometimes its more about the marketing of a product than the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bearn</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-705672</link>
		<dc:creator>bearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3556#comment-705672</guid>
		<description>Other then cosmetic changes it offers no more functionality over an almost 10 year old OS (XP). Actually XP is more functional. MS has rearranged stuff and burried important functions that take twice as long to get to and alter. From a networkers standpoint. It just plain sucks. 

Not to mention we finally got PC hardware to a point where we can have some killer performance and MS ruins it all by throwing an OS to cripple what used to be descent machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other then cosmetic changes it offers no more functionality over an almost 10 year old OS (XP). Actually XP is more functional. MS has rearranged stuff and burried important functions that take twice as long to get to and alter. From a networkers standpoint. It just plain sucks. </p>
<p>Not to mention we finally got PC hardware to a point where we can have some killer performance and MS ruins it all by throwing an OS to cripple what used to be descent machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-701694</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3556#comment-701694</guid>
		<description>Microsoft caved and put DRM architecture in Vista to appease the RIAA/MPAA. Every minute your Vista PC is on it is using cycles just waiting to use its DRM. That&#039;s pretty lame and MS will never get my money for Vista so long as the DRM is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft caved and put DRM architecture in Vista to appease the RIAA/MPAA. Every minute your Vista PC is on it is using cycles just waiting to use its DRM. That&#8217;s pretty lame and MS will never get my money for Vista so long as the DRM is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-701480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=3556#comment-701480</guid>
		<description>Um... the experiment has probably ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; the experiment has probably ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/08/mojave-experiment/feed/ ) in 0.47516 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:44 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:44 pm UTC -->
