<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fix Light Text on Dark Background to Reduce Eye Strain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/09/fix-light-text-on-dark-background/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/09/fix-light-text-on-dark-background/</link>
	<description>Technology, Blogging, New Media and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:17:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/09/fix-light-text-on-dark-background/comment-page-1/#comment-737971</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4052#comment-737971</guid>
		<description>I agree with Stanley...I&#039;m a programmer, so I work editing text 8,12, sometimes 20 hours at a time, using an editor set to light colors on a dark background, because I find this creates the LEAST eyestrain.  Thus when I do a webpage I do the same thing.  I do not like the very high contrast in your example tho; it would be more normal to use green or cyan.  White on black is better for highlights.  And by &quot;dark&quot; I do not necessarily mean #000000.  Contrast is the real issue and it is not as simplistic or &quot;black and white&quot; as you put it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Stanley&#8230;I&#8217;m a programmer, so I work editing text 8,12, sometimes 20 hours at a time, using an editor set to light colors on a dark background, because I find this creates the LEAST eyestrain.  Thus when I do a webpage I do the same thing.  I do not like the very high contrast in your example tho; it would be more normal to use green or cyan.  White on black is better for highlights.  And by &#8220;dark&#8221; I do not necessarily mean #000000.  Contrast is the real issue and it is not as simplistic or &#8220;black and white&#8221; as you put it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Leung</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/09/fix-light-text-on-dark-background/comment-page-1/#comment-719739</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4052#comment-719739</guid>
		<description>Personally I prefer light text on black background.  I am quite surprised to find there are a lot of people who prefer the other way round.  Most site currently have light or white backgrounds with dark or black text.  It seems that the choice should be left to the users.  Maybe a button on the browser that can let the users invert the color scheme easily if desired ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I prefer light text on black background.  I am quite surprised to find there are a lot of people who prefer the other way round.  Most site currently have light or white backgrounds with dark or black text.  It seems that the choice should be left to the users.  Maybe a button on the browser that can let the users invert the color scheme easily if desired ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goinglikesixty</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/09/fix-light-text-on-dark-background/comment-page-1/#comment-707324</link>
		<dc:creator>goinglikesixty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4052#comment-707324</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t want to make a big issue out of this, but most readability studies are based on 1. ink on paper, or 2. really rotten design (ala Ironic Sans) example.

Here is the result of a scientific study:
    * Green on yellow is the best colour scheme in the most conditions - except for italicised Arial, for which it&#039;s the worst.
    * Times New Roman on average is much better than Arial. (Surprising when you consider that most usability experts recommend san-serif fonts for on-screen reading).
    * The combination which gives the fastest response time is italicised (!) green Times New Roman on yellow background.
    * Black-on-grey is much faster to parse than black-on-white.
http://www.metalinkltd.com/?p=91

Good design affects readability. Font, color, kerning, leading, all have an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t want to make a big issue out of this, but most readability studies are based on 1. ink on paper, or 2. really rotten design (ala Ironic Sans) example.</p>
<p>Here is the result of a scientific study:<br />
    * Green on yellow is the best colour scheme in the most conditions &#8211; except for italicised Arial, for which it&#8217;s the worst.<br />
    * Times New Roman on average is much better than Arial. (Surprising when you consider that most usability experts recommend san-serif fonts for on-screen reading).<br />
    * The combination which gives the fastest response time is italicised (!) green Times New Roman on yellow background.<br />
    * Black-on-grey is much faster to parse than black-on-white.<br />
<a href="http://www.metalinkltd.com/?p=91" rel="nofollow">http://www.metalinkltd.com/?p=91</a></p>
<p>Good design affects readability. Font, color, kerning, leading, all have an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
