<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: View YouTube Videos in WideScreen Format</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Blogging Tips, Guestblogging, Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-714119</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4842#comment-714119</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty cool; but TechyNews is right, it&#039;s about time for not only the aspect ratio but also quality of YouTube to change (or at least match with Blip.TV, Revver, etc.).  Might the placebo effect, but it does look a bit better in widescreen (could also be the fact that the actual video is a smaller size).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty cool; but TechyNews is right, it&#8217;s about time for not only the aspect ratio but also quality of YouTube to change (or at least match with Blip.TV, Revver, etc.).  Might the placebo effect, but it does look a bit better in widescreen (could also be the fact that the actual video is a smaller size).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-713997</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4842#comment-713997</guid>
		<description>Cool! now i can watch youtube videos more comfortable than before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! now i can watch youtube videos more comfortable than before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechyNews</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-713984</link>
		<dc:creator>TechyNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=4842#comment-713984</guid>
		<description>Maybe I just don&#039;t get it?  So you have a camera that can record in wide screen high definition.  But when you upload it to youtube it becomes low definition wide screen garbage?  Am I wrong here?  Maybe youtube should support some higher bitrate uploads. They just wanted the wide screen to put a bigger ad at the bottom ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I just don&#8217;t get it?  So you have a camera that can record in wide screen high definition.  But when you upload it to youtube it becomes low definition wide screen garbage?  Am I wrong here?  Maybe youtube should support some higher bitrate uploads. They just wanted the wide screen to put a bigger ad at the bottom ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2008/11/widescreen-youtube-videos/feed/ ) in 0.42963 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 2:24 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:24 am UTC -->
