Comments on: Republish Content Legally from Gawker, Lifehacker, Gizmodo

By: bdplay.com

bdplay.com — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:45:26 +0000

Well i thing this is really useful post for those who do not want to make unique content and write or rewrite content. Anyway i definitely prefer unique content but if legality maintained then this method also good.

By: Warren Tunnell

Warren Tunnell — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:12:22 +0000

I don’t agree with everything in this piece of content, but you do make some very good points. I’m very interested in this subject matter and I myself do alot of research as well. Either way it was a well thoughtout and nice read so I figured I would leave you a comment. Feel free to check out my website sometime and let me know what you think.

By: Nicolas Stank

Nicolas Stank — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:49:03 +0000

This is a very useful post, I was looking for this information. Just so you know I located your blog site when I was checking for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.

By: Adam Pieniazek

Adam Pieniazek — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:24:17 +0000

What about duplicate content penalties? Or are they just so big they don’t worry about it?

Figure they’d get slammed with penalties for their content being pasted all over the web…

By: Bytetips

Bytetips — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:58:56 +0000

If bloggers re…publish articles from those sites, they are sending backlinks + traffic = Profit . Big…

By: QuickOnlineTips

QuickOnlineTips — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:46:46 +0000

And they get lots of free backlinks and traffic too, while retaining all rights.

By: Ganesh

Ganesh — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:43:46 +0000

A really great move by these blogs. It also removes apprehension of whether to quote from big blogs like lifehacker.

It also helps to publicize drastically lifehacker in not only via blogging medium but also in other mediums like TV etc., good move…