<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check Your Feedburner RSS Feed Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/</link>
	<description>Technology News, Blogging Tips, Guestblogging, Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas Pendyala</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-2/#comment-894480</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivas Pendyala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-894480</guid>
		<description>But I dont trust the websniffer tool. It said that my feed size is 56KiB. But feedburner stopped publishing because my actual feed file size was 657KB.  When I tried saving my feed file on hard disk the size is 657KB but websniffer tool always only reported as 56KiB. I use posterous blogging to post my audio podcasts. Is there a way I can decrease my feed file size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I dont trust the websniffer tool. It said that my feed size is 56KiB. But feedburner stopped publishing because my actual feed file size was 657KB.  When I tried saving my feed file on hard disk the size is 657KB but websniffer tool always only reported as 56KiB. I use posterous blogging to post my audio podcasts. Is there a way I can decrease my feed file size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ketones</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-1/#comment-885560</link>
		<dc:creator>ketones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-885560</guid>
		<description>Thank for the info

Glad that my RSS is within the limit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank for the info</p>
<p>Glad that my RSS is within the limit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Extreme</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-1/#comment-728005</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Extreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-728005</guid>
		<description>Thank I used Web Sniffer you posted and its 92k. I created a feed for a client and thought it was much bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank I used Web Sniffer you posted and its 92k. I created a feed for a client and thought it was much bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-1/#comment-727191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-727191</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the advise.
Checked my sites feed size and they were all below the limit, between 30 - 50 KiB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the advise.<br />
Checked my sites feed size and they were all below the limit, between 30 &#8211; 50 KiB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-1/#comment-727181</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-727181</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very useful info for bloggers,I checked my blog feed size and it is just under 100kb thanks for info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very useful info for bloggers,I checked my blog feed size and it is just under 100kb thanks for info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Masson</title>
		<link>http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/comment-page-1/#comment-727172</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Masson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/?p=7644#comment-727172</guid>
		<description>I never thought about this before, the size of my RSS feed is well within exceptable limits. As for setting your post numbers in WP admin I don&#039;t see a problem in setting this at 50 and showing excerpts for your feeds. Isn&#039;t this a good tactic for building your backlinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought about this before, the size of my RSS feed is well within exceptable limits. As for setting your post numbers in WP admin I don&#8217;t see a problem in setting this at 50 and showing excerpts for your feeds. Isn&#8217;t this a good tactic for building your backlinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/05/feedburner-rss-feed-size/feed/ ) in 0.92799 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 10:26 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:26 pm UTC -->
